Hi all again,
here's the running commmentary on the emails between Wilma Nandi Sevenster, or Nandi as she more often goes by. Date of birth 19 September 1979.
So to summarize, as per her repayment schedule she came up with her self, there was to be $500 net nz per month, with the total debt being settled by Jan 2012.
now since no payment was recieved in August, that means to 'stay on schedule' $1000 net nz is due by the 20th of september.
And $500 net nz per month due the 20th of october/november/december.
With the remaining ~ $1500 net nz due by 20th January 2012. This is all based on a repayment schedule Nandi herself came up with, knowing full well her employment situation, and that was all she could afford.
today is the 14th of september 2011, and Nandi now has less than a week to get the next instalment in or i will have to 'ramp it up a notch'
There are already numerous good quality photos as well as a scan of her passport for everyone to 'clearly identify' Nandi. I wouldn't want someone with the same name and birthday to be mis-identified as the person this site is about after all.
And numerous other avenues are still avalible that i have yet to undertake, as long as Nandi pays me in the installments she REPEATEDLY said she would, i won't have to take this any furthur.
In total there is $4042 nz net debt left, that's been owing for more than 2 years 8 months from December 2008.
The bulk of her emails are irrelevant still talking about her conspiracy theories and such, and to each of her statments, ie she has "done nothing wrong except accepting bribe money" is wrong on so many levels.
1)I have given L&G's interactions with her as an example of 'something wrong' ie running out on rent you owe people.
2)The money i spent on her behalf as a LOAN, was not a bribe, as it was all on stuff she asked me to spend on her behalf.
as always here's the unedited emails for you all to read. There's been quite a bit of emails from nandi of late, but unfortunatly it is just more of the Crazieness ravings and continuing delaying tactics that everyone has already seen before.
Kingsenton
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> From: nandi sevenster [mailto:nandisevenster@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, 12 September 2011 7:52 a.m.
> To: XX> Subject:
> HOW MUCH ARE THEY PAYING YOU XX
>
> IN PUTTING UP ALL THE SLANDEROUS THINGS YOU'VE
>
> SAID OF ME UP TO THIS POINT OF TIME?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> From: nandi sevenster [mailto:nandisevenster@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, 12 September 2011 8:28 a.m.
> To: XX
> Subject:
> XX I AM OPENING A CASE AGAINST YOU FOR
> SLANDERING MY NAME WITHOUT ANY REASON, FOR I HAVE DONE
> NO HARM AGAINST YOU, NOR ANYONE ELSE.
> THE ONLY THING I'VE DONE WRONG WAS TO ACCEPT BRIBE MONEY
> THAT I DIDNT KNOW AT THAT POINT OF TIME WAS MATTER OF FACT AND
> THE TRUTH, BRIBE MONEY.
> FOR THE LAST TIME, THE UTMOST LAST TIME, AND YOU CAN READ,
> YOU CAN UNDERSTAND THIS WORDS ON THIS E-MAIL,
> FOR SO MANY TIMES I'VE SAID TO YOU THAT I WILL GIVE YOU
> YOUR MONEY BACK. FROM $7000 TO $4000 SOMETHING IS ALREADY THE
> PROOF THAT I HAVE MADE ATTEMPTS TO GIVE YOU BACK.
> HOWEVER, IF YOU DO NOT REMOVE EVERYTHING THAT YOU'VE
> SAID ABOUT ME YOU WILL NOT GET ANYTHING BACK.
> I HONOUSTLY SUGGEST THAT YOU REMOVE EVERYTHING YOU SAID ABOUT ME
> EVERYWHERE XX.
> I MEAN WHAT I SAY, AND SAY WHAT I MEAN. TRUST ME, DO THE RITE THING
> HERE AND REMOVE ALL THINGS YOU SAID ABOUT ME, EVERYWHERE
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 9/11/11, XX wrote:
> You have made some attempts I agree in repaying me, but nothing
> consistent, and spread sporadically over the intervening (almost 3
> years). Each repayment has been documented on line, and you will see
> that the more up to date entries record a value left of $4042 nz,
which
> is accurate. I have not denied that some payments have been made,
it's
> all there for everyone to see.
>
> Your dad made a repayment of $2000, you made 3 repayments so far of
> ~160, $485, $473, I'm not denying they have happened; all I'm saying
is
> where is the rest?
> Spaced out with numerous lies ie your original suggested repayment
plan,
> or your numerous other empty promises of repayments that never
> eventuated what about that payment of $1000 you said your dad would
make
> that never happened? Even your most up to date repayment suggestion of
> $500 nz per month, with the total amount being settled by Jan 2012 -
you
> did not send any repayment in August like you said you would, so ...
you
> failed to live up to even your own words.
> "THE ONLY THING I'VE DONE WRONG WAS TO ACCEPT BRIBE MONEY"
> Really?
> What about L & G, and not paying them rent for ~ 2 months? I was
there, when they confronted you, they took you into their home and you
betrayed their trust. You had an adult conversation that "board (rent)
including food/water/electricity/phone was $90 per week, and that you were to
chip in with chores and groceries when you could, and that they weren't
> making any money on that it was just at cost".
> I was there when in March 2009 they finally confronted you and said
> what's going on and why you hadn't paid them any rent for the time you
> were there. You knew they were down to one income, had a teenaged kid to
> support, how could you do that? Each of the 3 times I had stayed with
> them, I left them ~$100 for the 2-3 days I stayed there, so I wasn't
> 'freeloading' off them either, I think on one of the occasions I
bought
> some groceries too.
> By staying there you put them in greater financial difficulty going
> further into debt just to support you, who lied to them.
> And I have already told you and given ample examples of how the money
> was not a bribe, of which you have no counter argument. Not that
that's
> a valid point in the 1st place, the main point is that you owe me the
> money since Dec 2008, and still owe me $4042.
> "NO HARM AGAINST YOU, NOR ANYONE ELSE."
> Really? I think both Candice and "Amy" would differ in their opinions
of that.
> Not that your interactions with them have anything to do with me, but
> since they both either contacted or wanted to contact the Police about
> you ... I think the police would have a different opinion in that
> matter.
> I have given you every opportunity to repay me the total figure, which
> you could have well done by now, had you wanted to. During the 1year +
> you were working for the Technical collage, you didn't send me
anything,
> instead ignoring my repeated communications with you.
> You really should look up the definition of slander: it's only slander
> if the statement made is untrue. And well everything I've said can be
> verified through 3rd parties, which I have encouraged everyone to do,
to verify for themselves the facts.
> If you don't send me anything by the 20th of September, ie your
partial
> repayment of $1000 (August + September repayments as per your
schedule),
> or even better the total outstanding debt, yet more information will be
> made available to the public.
> I'm sure you've had a chance to check out the numerous pictures of you
> that have been since made available, to enable others to clearly
> identify you, and avoid a mix up with someone with the same name and
DOB
> isn't mistaken as you. Where as before those reading the various
sites,
> had only poor quality grainy pictures and a written description of
> you... now you can be clearly spotted.
> More stuff will be put up either from the hundreds of emails in the
> archives or through the information I have.
> I won't be removing the things I've said since it's all true, and like I
> said over 2 years ago, if you don't give me the money, these and more
> are the consequences of your inaction.
> You're all about the 'truth' why don't you want the truth of how you
> have and continue to behave be known?
> If you want it known that you are a 'good' person ect, then all you've
> got to do, is give me the outstanding funds, then the last entry on the
> various sites, will be that you have settled the total debt, and
that's
> the end of the story. Every one can examine the process up to the end,
> and decide for themselves.
> The only way you're going to get this to end is to give me the money
you
> repeatedly have said you do owe me and will give me back.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----Original Message-----
From: nandi sevenster [mailto:nandisevenster@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 12 September 2011 10:57 p.m.
To: XX
Subject: Re: Still $4042 net nz debt owing, $1000 due by 20 sept 2011.
with $500 due in October+November+December, and remaining ~ $1500 due in
Jan 2012. as per YOUR repament schedule.
My dad paid the $2000? Dad? Please explain.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From XX
Sent: Tuesday, 13 September 2011 10:55 a.m.
To: 'nandi sevenster'
Subject: RE: Still $4042 net nz debt owing, $1000 due by 20 sept 2011.
with $500 due in October+November+December, and remaining ~ $1500 due in
Jan 2012. as per YOUR repament schedule.
It was his name on the bank transfer documents as the sender.
He may have sent it on your behalf, but it was his name and not your
name on the bank documents.
I also acknowledge you made some small payments to the debt collection
agency, but those payments were swallowed up in fees, and I never got
anything NET out of your payments that you made to the debt collection
agency.
But more importantly, when are you next sending that partial repayment
of $1000 net nz? As per your repayment schedule the $1000 is to be
received on this end by the 20th of September.
-----------------------------------------------
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:27 AM, XX> wrote:
Perhaps I need to further clarify,
Your adoptive father H.Meyer you sent him the email requesting this
payment be put into my account, which he then did, back in 2009.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: nandi sevenster [mailto:nandisevenster@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 14 September 2011 1:41 a.m.
To: XX
Subject: Re: Still $4042 net nz debt owing, $1000 due by 20 sept 2011. with $500 due in October+November+December, and remaining ~ $1500 due in Jan 2012. as per YOUR repament schedule.
I DO NOT HAVE FAMILY.
LEAVE ME OUT OF ALL OF THIS CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES. I DO NOT
WANT ANY PART OF IT.
DO NOT EMAIL ME AGAIN, EVER AGAIN XX
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 10:03 PM, XX> wrote:
What ever you want to call Hendrik, is your problem, you originally referred to him as your adoptive father, but whatever I don’t care who is and isn’t your family.
As for ‘criminal activities’ I have already told your alternate views of reality don’t concern me nor are they relevant to your outstanding debt.
More importantly:
When are you next sending that $1000 due by 20 September 2011?
Your words, your repayment schedule. You want it known that you are a ‘good’ person who tells the truth, well you still have the opportunity to live up to your statement. Send me the money.
I’ve answered all your erroneous questions, and even provided evidence to the contrary of your statements, all of which are NOT relevant, to the outstanding debt you still do and continue to owe me from Dec 2008 $4042 net nz.
You are well aware of the alternative avenues I have yet to take.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: nandi sevenster [mailto:nandisevenster@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 14 September 2011 9:06 a.m.
To: XX
Subject: Re: $1000 due by 20 sept 2011. with $500 due in October+November+December, and remaining ~ $1500 due in Jan 2012. as per YOUR repament schedule. Still $4042 net nz debt owing,
LOS MY UIT XX
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 10:10 PM XX> wrote:
Unless that is a DATE and DOLLAR FIGURE of how much you are going to or have sent to me, to arrive by the 20th September 2011.
It is irrelevant.
I don’t care about your conspiracy /supernatural /religion /family/ ex-partner/ ect theories or issues
$1000 is due by the 20th of September (as per your repayment schedule) if you want to avoid more information being made available.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: nandi sevenster [mailto:nandisevenster@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 14 September 2011 9:12 a.m.
To: XX
Subject: Re: $1000 due by 20 sept 2011. with $500 due in October+November+December, and remaining ~ $1500 due in Jan 2012. as per YOUR repament schedule. Still $4042 net nz debt owing,
LOL, YOU WILL NOT DARE.
LEAVE ME ALONE, I AM NOT GOING TO BE PART OF ANY CRIMINAL
ACTIVITIES.
LOS MY UIT, LOS MY UIT, LOS MY UIT, LOS MY UIT XX !!!!!!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: XX
Sent: Wednesday, 14 September 2011 10:24 a.m.
To: nandisevenster@gmail.com
Cc: nandisevenster143@gmail.com; nandisevenster@yahoo.com
Subject: RE: $1000 due by 20 sept 2011. with $500 due in October+November+December, and remaining ~ $1500 due in Jan 2012. as per YOUR repament schedule. Still $4042 net nz debt owing,
Importance: High
I have repeatedly stated that I am not part of any ‘network’ or criminal activities as you claim, nor is there even one in existence that you have provided any evidence for.
Which is irrelevant.
‘los my uit’ whatever, if you want to go writing in gibberish or otherwise, unless it’s about you debt and your repayment, It is IRRELEVANT.
You’re not the only person that can use caps lock, but again, irrelevant.
You’ve seen your pictures up online, which means that anyone else can also find the information and pictures online.
I am trying to work with you here and compromise, you stated that you could only afford $500 per month, despite your work circumstances, and the total debt would be settled by January 2012.
Since you missed last months payment that means that 2x500 = $1000 due this month (by the 20th of September 2011).
You say you are ‘fed up with this’ then why are you dragging this out? That’s one answer you’ve yet to answer.
You haven’t explored every source of money to repay me, what about the more than 1 year gap while you were working at the technical collage and didn’t send me any repayments, even after I called off the debt collection agency at YOUR request, since you said you would repay me directly?
Let me repeat this for yet more clarity:
The only way you are going to get this situation to end is by giving me the total outstanding debt, and settling the TOTAL figure ($4042 net nz).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
